I disagree. The Wright Obama issue is private too, and as relevant as the Clinton's marriage. In other words, either both are or both are not. Wrights words are not Obamas, they are just an indication his mindset and character. Just as Hillary's marriage is as well.

Obama obviously supports that message as he's been a member of that church for 20 years and calls Rev. Wright, his spiritual mentor.  This was not a private conversation between two friends.  Wright released this on DVD as his "greatest hits".  There is also the matter that he was actively endorsing Obama from the pulpit which means that that church should not have tax-exempt status. 

I disagree with you completely.  It is not for the public to say whether a candidate should or should not have stayed in their marriage.  It is absolutely a private matter.

Between that issue and the lying (and not just this time) her credibility is seriously shot. The only reason I can see for her to stay in a marriage with a husband who is not committed, is to advance her political career.

She knew what the events were in Bosnia. She wrote them down in her autobiography. CBS showed three times in this campaign where she misrepresented (read:lied about) those events. I think the question on whether or not this was a lie or simply forgetting the facts comes down to motive. She has motive to bolster her foreign policy experience. Landing under fire helps that.

It's really getting tough to read your accounts of Hillary. I keep reading bleat bleat bleat. She lied. The best thing she can do is admit it.

Okay, she's not Rambo. 

You can assume this but you don't know and it really isn't your business. 

She did admit it.  At least, I admit my bias.  I don't pretend to be what I'm not. 

Actually, you do not disagree completely, only partially. I agree it is not the publics place to decide, nor did I say so (and if that was your original intent, I appologize for not getting that the first time).

It also is not the publics place to decide which church Obama goes to. But it is the place for the public to know about both (and then decide). The decision should be the person's alone.

I look at their descision making abilities. Hillary has a long history of making bad descisions and continues to do so. Obama has dealt with every situation judiciously. Every time he's attacked, he comes back with exactly the right response. Maybe it's street smarts or whatever you want to call it, but he's definitely the brightest of the candidates.

Obama does not have enough experience and he isn't going to hold up to a national campaign against McCain. 

It is absolutely my business. If she intendeds to run this country, there is no part of her character that shouldn't be put under the microscope. You may not care about the future of this country based on your bias but there are quite a few of us that think that it all matters.

The fact that she told a similar story about the Bosnia situation three times that was a fabrication speaks volumes about her character. It says that she will say anything to get what she wants.

http://www.cbsnews.com/sections/i_video/main500251.shtml?id=3968364n

I think it's even worse that when she was called on it, she continued to lie about the events. The best thing she could have done was to just not comment on her actions until she had the story correct. You don't lie to cover another lie. We don't need liars in the White House.

You may call it bias but it looks more like blindness.

She only lied becaues she loves America so much that she wanted to dodge sniper for her country. 

I'm just really counting on getting a cabinet post or an ambassadorship for my continued support. 

Not Veep?

That makes it all better.

I knew there had to be some sort of fantastical reason for this sort of support.

Hilary is obsessed, she stayed with Bill because she felt he could help in her political obsession. If she felt he was now standing in her way she'd go "Kill Bill" and eat his liver with some "farvar beans an a nice Chianti"

If you take a look a hard look at both the democrat candidates, it really shows how pathetic their party has become.

 

 

Obama has a good talk but is that all the people of this country need in a President? I mean Barack sounds like a great advocate for Black peoples rights, I say Black because not all Black people are African-Americans, but does talking a good talk make a President of the US? I don't know if anyone has actually noticed but where are Obama's goals? Where are Obama's ideas and solutions? Where are all the stuff these Presidential candidates promiss but never keep?

Then we have Hillary, the woman can't get her stories straight. Lies about non-important things. Continues to attack Bush as if he's running for President and pretty much her solutions leave very little to be desired.

I find it hard to believe that people are so upset with Bush that they will blindly follow anything that does not resemble Bush in any way. Even if it means voting for candidates like Obama or Hillary who's policies, mentalities and just all around attitud is disturbing to me. The sad part is that we are simply left with one who's policies, mentality and attitud are not far off from the Democratic candidates so in reality 2009 will be a losing year regardless who wins.

The old saying goes "things will get worse before they get better".